There is a painting hanging in the Oval Office, at least it will be for another week or so. President George W Bush calls the painting A Charge to Keep. He states it depicts missionaries delivering the word of God to others. It is a western style painting, of course (can't be a Texan without a little western). I find that endearing and hopeful. I have read that others do not. They want to point out that President Bush is wrong about the piece of artwork. That the painter was really trying to portray a horse thief riding away from an angry mob. But that leads me to my point, yes I do have one...Isn't art different things to different people?
How many debates have there been about the Mona Lisa? Our experiences and beliefs help us interpret and identify with art. If the viewer of a piece cannot interpret the art how they see fit then what is the point? Once I was standing in front of a painting at the Houston Museum of Fine Art and was really thinking about what I 'got' from the painting. A couple came and stood next to me and began discussing what they thought the painting was about. My version of what I thought the artist was conveying and their version were completely different. I wondered if we were even looking at the same painting. But that is what art is. It is like poetry. It can mean different things to different people. So if a person looks at a painting and interprets it differently than what the artist intended, don't scoff like the 'educated elite'. That is what the painting means to him and that is the true beauty of art.
Bro lu udah pada tau kan tentang slot qris
2 years ago